CampaignReel

Ad placement specs against what generators output

Prompt driven and audio driven, told apart

Some tools generate a scene from a written description. Others animate a person from a supplied audio track. Both publish lengths in seconds, and the figures describe completely different quantities, so ranking them together is a category error. As of 2026-09-12.

Three mechanisms behind one unitA duration parameter, a supplied speech file and a repeated grain produce three different quantities, all printed in seconds.Prompt drivenA parameterSet per requestHow long a scene holdsAudio drivenA speech fileSupplied firstA file handling boundBeat drivenA grainRepeated in one callA count of beatsAll three are published in secondsWhich one applies is decided in the brief
Fig. 1 Before the mechanism is settled the length column is actively misleading; after it, the comparison works.
Prompt and audio driven, as published. Recorded 2026-09-12.
Kind of toolWhat sets the lengthWhat the ceiling describes
Prompt drivenA duration parameterHow long a scene holds together
Audio drivenHow long the supplied track runsA bound on file handling
Beat drivenA grain repeated inside one requestHow many beats one job returns

Inclusion rule. Kinds of generation tool these sheets read, separated by what decides the length of the output. No ordering is implied between the resulting figures. Order. The most common kind first.

1Minutes and seconds are not two grades of the same thing

A prompt-driven ceiling says how long a generated scene can be held together before it falls apart. An audio-driven ceiling says how long a file the service will handle. Sorting them into one order puts a handling bound above a coherence bound and calls it capability.

That is why a length column on these sheets is never ranked. The mechanism is printed beside the figure so a reader can see which quantity is being measured.

2The choice is made in the brief, not in the column

An audio-driven tool is the right answer when the advertisement is a person speaking. A prompt-driven tool is the right answer when it is a scene playing. Neither is a better version of the other.

Once that is settled, the length column becomes useful again, because the comparison is then between figures that mean the same thing. Before it is settled the column is actively misleading.

3Beat-driven output is a third case

Where one request returns a long piece already cut into fixed beats, the length is neither a coherence bound nor a handling bound. It is a count of beats, and the cuts inside it were placed by the model.

That makes it the most favourable-looking figure on a length column and one of the most constrained in practice, because the beat structure is fixed and the cut points cannot be moved.

A vocabulary entry: the definition, plus how the specification pages on these sheets usually publish it. Table checked 2026-09-12. Nearby entries: IAA and IAP, First and last frame.

4Making the ad itself

For ad work around “Prompt and audio driven”, SceneMixer's pages explain how its ad projects are produced:

Measured across every job that finished successfully on scenemixer.com in the thirty days to 20 September 2026: analysis of a whole book runs about 2 minutes 49 seconds at the median, one episode's storyboard 1 minute 54 seconds, one video segment 3 minutes 20 seconds, and compositing an episode 3 minutes 52 seconds.

SceneMixer, Turn a Novel into a Video Series with AI — “How long does it take to produce one episode?” (read 2026-10-13)

The final cut ends on an end card: your main image plus four lines — Brand, Product name, Tagline, Call to action. The first two are read from your photo and your brief; the tagline and call to action are written with the script.

SceneMixer, The End Card (read 2026-10-13)